Full book · ReadAI club library
Cookery and Dining in Imperial Rome
by Apicius · Page 10 of 316 · 110,431 words
Tip · Use the reading mode control above and choose Scroll for a smoother flow through the full text.
nature of the task, requiring unique prerequisites--all these factors prompted us to undertake this translation." One word as to Mr. Vehling's work in America. He was for five years manager of catering at the Hotel Pfister in Milwaukee; for two and a half years he was inspector and instructor of the Canadian Pacific Railway; he was connected with some of the leading hotels in New York City, and with the Eppley and the Van Orman Hotels chains, in executive capacity. He not only has the practical side of food use and preparation, he is an authority upon the science in his field. His printed articles on food and cookery have been read with extraordinary interest, and his lectures upon culinary matters have been well received. It is to be hoped that both will eventually be published in book form. There is no financial lure in getting out an English translation of Apicius. It is a labor of love--but worth the doing. We have claimed that Mr. Vehling has exceptional fitness for the task. This will be evident to anyone who reads his book. An interesting feature of his preparation is the fact that Mr. Vehling has subjected many of the formulæ to actual test. As Dr. Lister in the old edition of 1705 increased the value and interest of the work by making additions from various sources, so our editor of today adds much and interesting matter in his supplements, notes and illustrations. It is hardly expected that many will follow Mr. Vehling in testing the Apician formulæ. Hazlitt in speaking of "The Young Cook's Monitor" which was printed in 1683, says: "Some of the ingredients proposed for sauces seem to our ears rather prodigious. In one place a contemporary peruser has inserted an ironical calculation in MS. to the effect that, whereas a cod's head could be bought for fourpence, the condiments recommended for it were not to be had for less than nine shillings." We shall close with a plagiarism oft repeated. It was a plagiarism as long ago as 1736, when it was admitted such in the
Other legal sources